Read of Day ?*
Speaking of Spare...
* OMGOP
M^: A
Shot in the Arm?, Neo-Perspectivism
^ 5th dimension : Tails
Aside (sc) [ ? ]
OLO?
4-13-15 ?!? [~]
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A
MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too
Random... , D. Re:Figure
, E. Rough
Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and
Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally
Anyone? , I. RUNNING
WITH RHETORIC .
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Mobius. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Mobius. Sort by date Show all posts
Monday, April 13, 2015
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Marco...
[...*] Rubio ?
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .
*[4-15-15 Marco ... polo update ]
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .
*[4-15-15 Marco ... polo update ]
Wednesday, April 01, 2015
Fed~Upism?
Knit One?
(a. FP4 (2-20-15) FP$, b.Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One), c. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, d. Shilling / Schiller, e. Try Angle Nation )
Pear Type-Oh? Re:nacre
(a. Knit one , b. or ?, c. Going through Hegel or..., d. Crooked Timber, e. 'n?, f. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, g. Remember Pearl Harbor! )
Ctlr F: type-O.(...) [!]
Irony within Onion ? [!]
Misplaced support ? (...)
(a. QCON and Flip-Flop: AN IRAN OUT, b. Under the Table?, c.The day of the Elephant?, d. Leveling the World Stage?, e. For Careful Processing:, f. There was the 3 AM call..., g. And Bailout..., h. GOLEFT TV ...?)
(un-Mbedded consequences? 4Lab-L's)
4-14-15
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .
(a. FP4 (2-20-15) FP$, b.Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One), c. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, d. Shilling / Schiller, e. Try Angle Nation )
Pear Type-Oh? Re:nacre
(a. Knit one , b. or ?, c. Going through Hegel or..., d. Crooked Timber, e. 'n?, f. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, g. Remember Pearl Harbor! )
Ctlr F: type-O.(...) [!]
Irony within Onion ? [!]
Misplaced support ? (...)
(a. QCON and Flip-Flop: AN IRAN OUT, b. Under the Table?, c.The day of the Elephant?, d. Leveling the World Stage?, e. For Careful Processing:, f. There was the 3 AM call..., g. And Bailout..., h. GOLEFT TV ...?)
(un-Mbedded consequences? 4Lab-L's)
4-14-15
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .
Friday, April 02, 2004
THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP
More about testimony: It would seem unprecedented that the selection of the Vice president was also un-presidential, in that the head of the search committee for Vice president selected himself.
This brings to mind as they testify in tandem, somewhat of a Charlie McCarthyism.
A mobius loop is another image that earlier came to mind and was triggered as Cheney declared Clarke out of the loop.
[No links were originally provided at the date of this post, but on 3-24-08 I now update starting with the Huffington link below at CommonDreams.org regarding updated democracy and pertains to testimony before congress and the 9-11 committee both of which are after my post. And to blow the Punch and Judy line above, there is the puppet and there are the investigations, and there is self defeating. (But the last bit just fell into place]
[6-8-09: I am uncertain as to my Punch and Judy reference, unless it is to the unPC of it or the self-defeating nature of it all.]
[not to mention 8-13-09]
This brings to mind as they testify in tandem, somewhat of a Charlie McCarthyism.
A mobius loop is another image that earlier came to mind and was triggered as Cheney declared Clarke out of the loop.
[No links were originally provided at the date of this post, but on 3-24-08 I now update starting with the Huffington link below at CommonDreams.org regarding updated democracy and pertains to testimony before congress and the 9-11 committee both of which are after my post. And to blow the Punch and Judy line above, there is the puppet and there are the investigations, and there is self defeating. (But the last bit just fell into place]
[6-8-09: I am uncertain as to my Punch and Judy reference, unless it is to the unPC of it or the self-defeating nature of it all.]
[not to mention 8-13-09]
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government.
Cheney's place as "Angler" has now been disclosed in a four-part series in the Washington Post, where "understanding" is the key word.
[note that there is a lot of hard work here, by others *]
What does the Vice-President's claim that he is not part of the Executive Branch do to earlier claims of executive privilege? I think it would fall under Unitary theory that Cheney and Bush have whatever powers Cheney has decided for them and Bush understands only that, not that it puts Cheney in charge of the whole ball of wax.
A few earlier post of mine on the loop as long as we are into geometry.
The Truth Apparent: A Mobius Lap
Running with Rhetoric
Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality
Original Intent
Sorry for my own little four-part review(much shorter than the WaPo though, of which only three are out yet, and I've only read a few paragraphs), but as opposed to the "Angler" who approaches "the levers of power obliquely, skirting orderly lines of debate he once enforced as chief of staff to President Gerald R. Ford.", I must brink up my ealier tangents that have already visited the subjects but only touch a point on a curve.
From Randi's cite:*
House Democrats to cut funds for VP from Executive Branch. Raw Story
Senate challenge understanding as well. NY Times
Bush thinking (see above) "the law"
Press conference on "non issue" of oversight
On wire-taps by Judge
CIA of the going back to Nixon Era released.
Condemned or chosen to repeat.
GITMO A & B
HALLIBURTON A & B
Prosecutor Purge
Vote Caging: speaking of returns and locked up.
And off of AM1090 Seattle cite:
Democracy Now has Rocky Anderson as guest on the impeachment process.
Thanks to Randi Rhodes for the real "hard work", which I have not done yet by reading these, but getting them together is a start, and for you to continue the "hard work" as well. Of which, the first post indicates that Bush does not read much of what he signs from Cheney.
* This stems from a few days ago when this broke(the first link) and I was probably listening to Randi Rhodes and I thought, that if there is an EO (executive order)that Bush has signed and given their pattern of behavior, it does probably not apply to the President or whomever he choose not to appy it to, and probably didn't need to include a signing statement on his own EO as his privileges include that only he knows what he means. If that. And that is another imagined out or bunker of their mind. (I believe David Bender or Ring of Fire or a guest deserves note for the last reference.)
[note that there is a lot of hard work here, by others *]
What does the Vice-President's claim that he is not part of the Executive Branch do to earlier claims of executive privilege? I think it would fall under Unitary theory that Cheney and Bush have whatever powers Cheney has decided for them and Bush understands only that, not that it puts Cheney in charge of the whole ball of wax.
A few earlier post of mine on the loop as long as we are into geometry.
The Truth Apparent: A Mobius Lap
Running with Rhetoric
Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality
Original Intent
Sorry for my own little four-part review(much shorter than the WaPo though, of which only three are out yet, and I've only read a few paragraphs), but as opposed to the "Angler" who approaches "the levers of power obliquely, skirting orderly lines of debate he once enforced as chief of staff to President Gerald R. Ford.", I must brink up my ealier tangents that have already visited the subjects but only touch a point on a curve.
From Randi's cite:*
House Democrats to cut funds for VP from Executive Branch. Raw Story
Senate challenge understanding as well. NY Times
Bush thinking (see above) "the law"
Press conference on "non issue" of oversight
On wire-taps by Judge
CIA of the going back to Nixon Era released.
Condemned or chosen to repeat.
GITMO A & B
HALLIBURTON A & B
Prosecutor Purge
Vote Caging: speaking of returns and locked up.
And off of AM1090 Seattle cite:
Democracy Now has Rocky Anderson as guest on the impeachment process.
Thanks to Randi Rhodes for the real "hard work", which I have not done yet by reading these, but getting them together is a start, and for you to continue the "hard work" as well. Of which, the first post indicates that Bush does not read much of what he signs from Cheney.
* This stems from a few days ago when this broke(the first link) and I was probably listening to Randi Rhodes and I thought, that if there is an EO (executive order)that Bush has signed and given their pattern of behavior, it does probably not apply to the President or whomever he choose not to appy it to, and probably didn't need to include a signing statement on his own EO as his privileges include that only he knows what he means. If that. And that is another imagined out or bunker of their mind. (I believe David Bender or Ring of Fire or a guest deserves note for the last reference.)
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
Mobius File*
NFRY
Some source to address the popular vote claim of Hillary Clinton.
RealClearPolitics: Democratic Delegate Count**
Newsweek: (~) The problem with popular math.
VoteForAmerica.net
PoliticusUsa ~ the flaw
*not quite circular file
**oops! the only real 2016 source here
preemptive conclusion: We aren't there yet.
4-15-16 The right candidates[!] Too File.
4-19-16 Not my usual geometrics.
4-23-16 Washington Post: Delegate Reference
Some source to address the popular vote claim of Hillary Clinton.
RealClearPolitics: Democratic Delegate Count**
Newsweek: (~) The problem with popular math.
VoteForAmerica.net
PoliticusUsa ~ the flaw
*not quite circular file
**oops! the only real 2016 source here
preemptive conclusion: We aren't there yet.
4-15-16 The right candidates[!] Too File.
4-19-16 Not my usual geometrics.
4-23-16 Washington Post: Delegate Reference
Friday, July 24, 2015
The Square Root of
[" i. "]
This ... is not being facetious or Freudian. But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*
BTW: NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive
Co-wink Key-dink ? D'oh!
(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)
1. the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2. Chesterton on importance of fables
3. ditto
4. semantic (bs)/bs
5. Mobius
Notational Segway [!] *
*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you
This ... is not being facetious or Freudian. But is there some Hume or Hegel or other geometrics useful to a Platonic Frame?*
BTW: NFRY (not fully read yet) i.e. a bit preemptive
Co-wink Key-dink ? D'oh!
(7-25-15 Fyi: LOL footnotes yet included[!] i.e. under construction)
1. the imaginary unit to solve negative square roots?
2. Chesterton on importance of fables
3. ditto
4. semantic (bs)/bs
5. Mobius
Notational Segway [!] *
*inserting the links, not to read between the lines for you
Sunday, December 01, 2013
Too Random...
...Righty[!]
Knot 2 fraught with fraud'nfreud?
Freedom the foundation or fountainhead?
A stopped clock is right...
too undimention,
1* over infinity has left.
* poetic license in 3 or 4-D.
won over
**
knot exactly; 1/infinity= zorro?
But seriously to unpun one in particular, freedom over everything is the problem.
Freedom over everything equals nothing over physics.
12-2-13 (...)added and *reframed
** s/b standard mobius/infinity (Thought I had previously used one, not this one.)
Embedded links:(Not fully read.)
1. The Difficulty with Hegel
2. Hegel or Anti-Hegel
Fully Read and Reviewing:
The Hegel Myth and its Method: (Kaufmann 1959)Akin to Plato's Form(The Socratics of the Ideal and States)^
Selections:
"The writings of Hegel and Plato abound in admittedly one-sided statements that are clearly meant to formulate points of view that are then shown to be inadequate and are countered by another perspective. Thus an impressive quilt quotation could be patched together to convince gullible readers that Hegel was — depending on the “scholar’s” plans — either emphatically for or utterly opposed to, say, “equality.” But the understanding of Hegel would be advanced ever so much more by citing one of his remarks about equality in context, showing how it is a step in an argument that is designed to lead the reader to a better comprehension of equality and not to enlist his emotions either for it or against it."
"Hegel was rarely cited in the Nazi literature, and, when he was referred to, it was usually by way of disapproval. (...) Rosenberg also stressed, and excoriated, the “Socratic” elements in Plato."
References to 3D/4M@. English***, Math, Form~process.
*** generic word language/numbers as an ideal and a language/so-called results.
I do not necessarily want to break out of my understanding of Hegel, not say he would have understood it my way or anyone else's. But is Popper properly popped? Yet I do use a method of labelism/reference/progression-digression. The hazards of the Internet, not to mention old material, one might not recall running into sources before. I developed my tetrahedron courtesy of my older work on The Republic(1970~), delineating the mass-energy equivalence formula, and possibly Milo Wolff.(2004~)
In the above not yet reads, but glanced at's, they may have a point, and may be missing or pointing from their own point. I may yet to agree or disagree with them, but still appreciate or depreciate their points.
^ & ~ must be reviewed. "Dates~" note time of encounter.
12-3-13 (FP1) Have yet to locate "^". [rtd]
12-4-13 That's the ticket ! ?
But to tilt at swans?
12-9-13 Roughly 13 in rough.
12-10-13 Scientific American Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians
verses RealClearPolitics Newtonian Government
Trinity Squared ?
Knot 2 fraught with fraud'nfreud?
Freedom the foundation or fountainhead?
A stopped clock is right...
too undimention,
1* over infinity has left.
* poetic license in 3 or 4-D.
won over
**knot exactly; 1/infinity= zorro?
But seriously to unpun one in particular, freedom over everything is the problem.
Freedom over everything equals nothing over physics.
12-2-13 (...)added and *reframed
** s/b standard mobius/infinity (Thought I had previously used one, not this one.)
Embedded links:(Not fully read.)
1. The Difficulty with Hegel
2. Hegel or Anti-Hegel
Fully Read and Reviewing:
The Hegel Myth and its Method: (Kaufmann 1959)Akin to Plato's Form(The Socratics of the Ideal and States)^
Selections:
"The writings of Hegel and Plato abound in admittedly one-sided statements that are clearly meant to formulate points of view that are then shown to be inadequate and are countered by another perspective. Thus an impressive quilt quotation could be patched together to convince gullible readers that Hegel was — depending on the “scholar’s” plans — either emphatically for or utterly opposed to, say, “equality.” But the understanding of Hegel would be advanced ever so much more by citing one of his remarks about equality in context, showing how it is a step in an argument that is designed to lead the reader to a better comprehension of equality and not to enlist his emotions either for it or against it."
"Hegel was rarely cited in the Nazi literature, and, when he was referred to, it was usually by way of disapproval. (...) Rosenberg also stressed, and excoriated, the “Socratic” elements in Plato."
References to 3D/4M@. English***, Math, Form~process.
*** generic word language/numbers as an ideal and a language/so-called results.
I do not necessarily want to break out of my understanding of Hegel, not say he would have understood it my way or anyone else's. But is Popper properly popped? Yet I do use a method of labelism/reference/progression-digression. The hazards of the Internet, not to mention old material, one might not recall running into sources before. I developed my tetrahedron courtesy of my older work on The Republic(1970~), delineating the mass-energy equivalence formula, and possibly Milo Wolff.(2004~)
In the above not yet reads, but glanced at's, they may have a point, and may be missing or pointing from their own point. I may yet to agree or disagree with them, but still appreciate or depreciate their points.
^ & ~ must be reviewed. "Dates~" note time of encounter.
12-3-13 (FP1) Have yet to locate "^". [rtd]
12-4-13 That's the ticket ! ?
But to tilt at swans?
12-9-13 Roughly 13 in rough.
12-10-13 Scientific American Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians
verses RealClearPolitics Newtonian Government
Trinity Squared ?
Friday, May 22, 2015
TRMS
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
Mobius Nuance?
Monday, January 25, 2016
"Juridical Positivism"
Bookmarks in Progress.
(b.s.) American Exceptionalism
(b.s.) Hegel Popper
** ~ (*) obviously not the only problem
The problem with science is labelism, perspectivism and humanity*.
...or generalizations and definitions.
( New Meta Theory ) ~Mobius asterisk*
Meanwhile.
[Antipodes of Narrative]
...(the muse escapes)***
[Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander]^
*** (apotheosize and anthropomorphize)
[Hegel’s philosophy is open to many objections, but to confound it with totalitarianism means to misunderstand it. Ernst Cassirer puts the matter very clearly in The Myth of the State (1946), a book dealing with much the same material as Popper’s, but in a much more scholarly manner. His Hegel chapter ends: “Hegel could extol and glorify the state, he could even apotheosize it. There is, however, a clear and unmistakable difference between his idealization of the power of the state and that sort of idolization that is the characteristic of our modern totalitarian systems.”]
^tetrahedron of history or teachers
[[Lacanian Leap?]]
(b.s.) American Exceptionalism
(b.s.) Hegel Popper
** ~ (*) obviously not the only problem
The problem with science is labelism, perspectivism and humanity*.
...or generalizations and definitions.
( New Meta Theory ) ~Mobius asterisk*
Meanwhile.
[Antipodes of Narrative]
...(the muse escapes)***
[Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander]^
*** (apotheosize and anthropomorphize)
[Hegel’s philosophy is open to many objections, but to confound it with totalitarianism means to misunderstand it. Ernst Cassirer puts the matter very clearly in The Myth of the State (1946), a book dealing with much the same material as Popper’s, but in a much more scholarly manner. His Hegel chapter ends: “Hegel could extol and glorify the state, he could even apotheosize it. There is, however, a clear and unmistakable difference between his idealization of the power of the state and that sort of idolization that is the characteristic of our modern totalitarian systems.”]
^tetrahedron of history or teachers
[[Lacanian Leap?]]
Tuesday, April 01, 2014
FOOTNOTES PAGE APRIL 2014
FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE
4-9-14 : Trinity of sorts? (s.c.) I will let the reader scroll or click(links 1,2 & 6) & an other trinity.
(b.s.) Not quite bingo or tic tack toe[!] ? [Or in F'n Try-modal?]
4-10-14 EH? ...] >v./, vii. Score Won..., viii. More Money?, ix. Bring It On!, x., xi. The Jig is Up? , xii. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP
4-17-14 Tzar Chasm or Bird Man: NewsNation/AM in the UCrane. Diplomacy in the Snowden Error or Obamanomics. Changing the conversation 'n turning the table & clause wits.
4-9-14 : Trinity of sorts? (s.c.) I will let the reader scroll or click(links 1,2 & 6) & an other trinity.
(b.s.) Not quite bingo or tic tack toe[!] ? [Or in F'n Try-modal?]
4-10-14 EH? ...] >v./, vii. Score Won..., viii. More Money?, ix. Bring It On!, x., xi. The Jig is Up? , xii. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP
4-17-14 Tzar Chasm or Bird Man: NewsNation/AM in the UCrane. Diplomacy in the Snowden Error or Obamanomics. Changing the conversation 'n turning the table & clause wits.
Sunday, April 07, 2013
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Rough Riders
THE? Senate Bill...
and its riders through Congress.
[Footnote from Mobius Strip...or the political calculus has not changed.]
and its riders through Congress.
[Footnote from Mobius Strip...or the political calculus has not changed.]
Monday, April 25, 2005
Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor?
Oh what a web we weave or mobius strip we ravel. I was going give a shout out earlier as a wake-up for the upcoming Justice Sunday events, but they may hopefully make it through the “so called Liberal” media filters. But cutting through the mangled message is not that difficult if you follow the borrow and twist method that has been my habit: You must simply take their statements or labels and sort out the facts. Well maybe not even that.
The so called aim of JCCCR.org is "Confronting the Judicial War on Faith". There basically is no judicial war on faith except theirs. They are actually fighting for their Truth and they are against anything else, especially Faith. Faith by definition is not Truth but actually depends on not knowing or having facts. It is even divorced from logic. Even this concept is not exactly absolute, but relative. Having knowledge, be they facts or understanding, does not rule out faith.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with faith. Truth is also part of the process, but understanding and faith are not strangers to it.
All links in this post were only glanced at, either during or after the process. The Al Franken Show and the mention of upcoming guests, from Andrew Sullivan.com to People for the American Way also deserve some credit for getting me rolling, but I probably missed some valuable comments while processing this and going overboard with definitions and links.
The so called aim of JCCCR.org is "Confronting the Judicial War on Faith". There basically is no judicial war on faith except theirs. They are actually fighting for their Truth and they are against anything else, especially Faith. Faith by definition is not Truth but actually depends on not knowing or having facts. It is even divorced from logic. Even this concept is not exactly absolute, but relative. Having knowledge, be they facts or understanding, does not rule out faith.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with faith. Truth is also part of the process, but understanding and faith are not strangers to it.
All links in this post were only glanced at, either during or after the process. The Al Franken Show and the mention of upcoming guests, from Andrew Sullivan.com to People for the American Way also deserve some credit for getting me rolling, but I probably missed some valuable comments while processing this and going overboard with definitions and links.
Friday, September 24, 2004
Stuart Smally Anyone?
The Hollow World of George Bush
If positive thinking works, who needs weapons?
QED or Mobius Faith?
And what the heck are we positive about?
Only the shadow knows. What about between the words and the deeds?
The future may be our only end, but the golden rule is a two way street.
* http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/092504Z.shtml">original link updated
If positive thinking works, who needs weapons?
QED or Mobius Faith?
And what the heck are we positive about?
Only the shadow knows. What about between the words and the deeds?
The future may be our only end, but the golden rule is a two way street.
* http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/092504Z.shtml">original link updated
Tuesday, April 27, 2004
RUNNING WITH RHETORIC
James Baker III who fixed the vote for Bush in Florida as he himself described it speaking to Russian oil oligarchs, represents the Republican party, Exxon, the Saudi government, the governing council in Iraq and does all of this out of an office in the White House? And a caller on the Dave Ross show asks Greg Palast if they (Cheney et al cabal) are taking anything under the table? Oh and this is not about oil or having your cake and eating it too? Or do as I say not as I do?
And Bush joked in his first media appearance things would be easier if he were dictator? Question mark belongs after both the resident and his joke. All other question marks replace quotes ironically.
(Upside down) Ed. Note: I have yet to figure out how to print stuff upside down, but ala Q&A or fun-books I should give footnotes or clues upside down for those having trouble with my writing style or MO. In this case an explanation: I escape responsibilities for direct quotes by using questions instead of quotations. Much as a rhetorical reply to the rhetorical administration. (Right side up: Sometimes my clues need footnotes.) I may have crossed the mobius loop of hypocrisy or irony. A visual I will refrain from footnoting.
And Bush joked in his first media appearance things would be easier if he were dictator? Question mark belongs after both the resident and his joke. All other question marks replace quotes ironically.
(Upside down) Ed. Note: I have yet to figure out how to print stuff upside down, but ala Q&A or fun-books I should give footnotes or clues upside down for those having trouble with my writing style or MO. In this case an explanation: I escape responsibilities for direct quotes by using questions instead of quotations. Much as a rhetorical reply to the rhetorical administration. (Right side up: Sometimes my clues need footnotes.) I may have crossed the mobius loop of hypocrisy or irony. A visual I will refrain from footnoting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)